News was prepared under the information support of Online Daily Newspaper on Hellenic and international Shipping "Hellenic Shipping News". |
30 Sep 2010
While Private Terminal Operators (PTO) are groaning over the failure of the Nigerian Ports Authority (NPA) and the Lagos Channel Management (LCM) to dredge the Lagos ports channel to between 13 to 14 metres as contained in the concession agreement, the NPA/LCM are smiling to the bank with over $100 million being collected annually from pilotage and towage services.
The terminal operators are presently bearing the brunt of the inability
or unwillingness of the NPA/LCM to meet their responsibility and have
been forced to make do with the present draught of between 10 to 11
metres which makes it impossible for bigger vessels to call at the
ports in Lagos.
While they are unwilling to come out with the facts about the draught
of both the channel leading to the port and those at the various
berths, when Ports and Habours called the Media Consultant of APM
Terminals Apapa Limited, Mr. Bolaji Akinola on the issue, he said they
could not speak on it but instead directed Ports and Habours to the NPA.
Similar efforts to speak with the spokesman of Sifax Group, Mr. Oliver
Omajuwa, was unsuccessful as he did not pick up the call when Ports and
Habours called him.
An official of one of the terminal told Ports and Habours that they
would not want to be drawn into any kind of controversy but the truth
of the matter is that “we are still operating at a draught of about 11
metres which is grossly inadequate.”
A chief executive of one of the terminals recently complained about the
action of the relevant body to dredge the channel in accordance with
the concession agreement entered into with government.
Investigations revealed that between 2007 and 2009, vessel traffic into
the Apapa and Tin-Can Island ports had increased from 2,000 vessels to
3,500, while the channels continued to accommodate vessels of higher
draught without marine accidents as vessels were always running aground
along the channel because of its shallow nature.
This, Ports and Habours can reveal, was as a result of the improved
storage facilities at the terminals and better management of containers
by PTO.
There was always delay of upward of four days for vessels to manoeuvre
into the ports from the fare-well buoy after completing their
international voyage. The situation caused delayed turn-around for the
vessel to the extent that owners started collecting extra charges.
It also attracted high insurance premium because of the increasing risk of piracy at anchorage around the Lagos waters.
Managing Director of LCM, Mr. Danny Fuch told Ports and Habours that it
is not true that the draught is still below 13 meters. Fuch said that
there are different situation for the different berths which makes
impossible for all the berths to be dredged to the same level.
He however noted that the issues involved in the dredging of the
channel can not be discussed on phone and asked that our reporter
should call at the office the next morning (Tuesday 28/09/10) at LCM
office for a proper interview.
When Ports and Habours got there at about 10.50am, our reporter was
made to wait for about 15 minutes at the gate before he was ushered to
the office where he had to wait for another 25 minutes. Our reporter
had to leave the office to keep another appointment.
Similarly, Musa Ileya, Assistant General Manager in charge of Public
Affairs of the NPA in his response when contacted by Ports and Habours
said maintenance of the channel is ongoing and that the 13 to 14 metres
draught mark can not be achieved in one day.
Asked why it is taking about five years after the concession agreement
to achieve the required draught level, the NPA spokesman said he could
not hear our reporter properly, assuring that he would call back and
the phone line went dead.
Several hours after when Ports and Habours tried to call him when our
reporter did not hear from him, his phone line was said to have been
switched-off.
The President, Nigerian Chapter of Institute of Transport
Administration, Mr. Lucky Amiwero, was recently quoted to have stressed
that it is the responsibility of the government to ensure availability
of deep water channels or berths. In his opinion, there is no way
inadequate investments in dredging could bring about good work for the
To him, the current pace in dredging is incapable of dealing
appropriately with the most pressing navigational problems of the ports.
He canvassed change, which will see dredging as an investment in economic growth.
Like other concerned stakeholders, Amiwero maintained that the government is behind schedule on achieving targets on dredging.
By now, the NPA ought to have accomplished a radical capital dredging
to differentiate the nation’s ports from those of rival countries, but
irregular work has not improved the channels. Within a short time, silt
and debris find their way back to the waterways, reducing the draught.
The NPA Act gave it the exclusive responsibility to maintain the
channels and make it navigable by providing unhindered access to the
ports.
It also gave the NPA the power to discharge these responsibilities
through any other persons authorised by it. It is by virtue of this
enabling law that the dredging contract of the Lagos ports was awarded
to the Lagos Channels Management Company Limited.
The port is the gateway to the nation’s economy. It is an all_weather
port. In many ways, it enjoys an enviable position among the nation’s
ports. Vessel traffic is up by over 65 per cent and an increase in the
number of larger vessels with deeper draughts by 30 per cent. But the
port has not been able to develop into one of the most_modern ports in
the sub-region, matching international standards.
The situation is getting worse by the fact that the chart about the waterway is said to be unreliable.
Watchers expect the capital dredging plan to achieve a 13.5_metre depth
for Apapa Port. This has not been possible. But Lagos Channels
Management Company Ltd said it attained a draught of 13.5 metres along
the Lagos axis, including Apapa and Badagry creeks.
The situation is not different in the South-South area were other ports are located.
In Port Harcourt, NPA in partnership with Bonny Channel Company (BCC)
was supposed to dredge the Bonny Channel from 6.4 meters to 11 metres
to serve the LNG vessels.
Though there are security challenges in the area threatening projects,
watchers still look up to the Bonny Channel Company to ensure safety
and better accessibility of calling ships to the area.
The Nigerian Liquefied Natural Gas Company (NLNG) is supporting the
dredging project. The gas company needs deeper and continuous dredging
of the Bonny Channel to cater for her modern gas carriers. This
involves regular management of the navigation aids like buoys through
refurbishment, position monitoring and maintenance.
The company carries out bathymetric surveys to determine the dredging
needs along the channel and river as well as maintenance dredging of
the waterways to navigable depth for all users.
The capital is done only in the channel, while maintenance is to be
done on the stretch. The capital dredging is to accommodate larger
vessels and LNG vessels. Warri and Calabar are like backwaters.
The dredging of Calabar Port has drawn concerns as there are
indications that the contract for the channel would be re_awarded by
the Federal Government. This means the government would have wasted $56
million as the channel was dredged by two companies about two years ago.
Former Minister of Transport, Alhaji Ibrahim Bio, had condemned the
dredging work at the Calabar channel and had described the $56 million
spent on the first dredging of the 86 kilometres port channel as a
waste.
The government, he had said, was considering a fresh contract for the
channel. The contract for the initial dredging was awarded to two
firms, Jan De Nul of Netherlands and Van Oord of Belgium in 2006.
He explained that Jan De Nul was to dredge from 1 to 55 km while Van
Oord was to dredge the balance and to remove 12.750 cubic metres of
sand from the 86km.
The minister criticised the dredging, saying “they (the contractors)
have been able to complete the expected distance but the 12.750_cubic
metre volume of sand was not removed”.
With the development and the poor nature of the Calabar channel, he
said: “We have to revisit the contract with a view to re-awarding it.
One of the technical issues with Calabar Port is siltation. The channel
has the highest siltation of 36 per cent”.
Source: Vanguard