News was prepared under the information support of Online Daily Newspaper on Hellenic and international Shipping "Hellenic Shipping News". |
30 Sep 2010
The China Iron & Steel Industry Association (CISA) suggested that iron ore prices should be linked to steel prices instead of iron ore indexes.
Shan Shanghua, secretary general of CISA, said at an international
forum on raw material that the quarterly pricing mechanism probably is
appropriate when market is unstable. That was the first time that CISA,
the coordinating body for Chinese steel mills in iron ore price
negations with foreign miners, agreed on the quarterly pricing
mechanism. Early this year, the global big three iron ore miners
(Companhia Vale do Rio Doce, Broken Hill Proprietary Billiton Ltd. and
Rio Tinto Group) launched the quarterly pricing mechanism to replace
the yearly pricing system.
Shan said the price indices for the quarterly pricing mechanism are not
reasonable, because they failed to address the problem of speculation
when the spot prices are higher than the quarterly prices and contract
violations when the spot prices are lower than the quarterly prices.
The price indices for the quarterly pricing system imposed by iron ore
miners on Chinese steel enterprises are based on the average cost,
insurance and freight (CIF) prices on China's spot market in the
previous quarter. However, spot iron ore imports only account for about
20 percent of China's total iron ore imports.
In addition, the current index mechanism for the quarterly pricing
system imposed by miners upon steel enterprises has brought about
plenty of uncertainties and unpredictability to the steel and related
downstream industries.
Therefore, CISA suggested that iron ore prices should be linked to
steel prices, because iron ore is not a final product. It is the
"primary material" that reflect the value of the iron ore, while the
iron ore only accounts for 30 percent cost of the primary materials
including steel plate, and long products.
Source: Xinhua News Agency