News was prepared under the information support of Online Daily Newspaper on Hellenic and international Shipping "Hellenic Shipping News". |
31 Oct 2010
The first meeting of the Chittagong Port Advisory Committee was held on Wednesday with the Shipping Minister in chair. The committee was formed in the wake of the deepening of the crisis recently centred on the port and when the port veritably turned inoperable from violence by a section of port workers and their backers. The army was called in prior to the formation of the committee.
The activities of members of the army, who took charge of operations of
the port, were praised in the meeting. The praise was well earned and
had to be expressed for the army’s involvement led to dramatic
improvements in the functioning of the port. The complete paralysis that
gripped the port was overcome almost immediately and full functioning
of it resumed as quickly. The turnaround time of ships that increased to
10-14 days before the complete cessation of activities in the port from
violence, has declined appreciably to 3-4 days. Even better turnaround
time is expected very soon.
The advisory committee’s meeting, while noting these positive
developments, also gave its opinion that the deployment of the army at
Chittagong Port cannot be a long lasting system. The Minister is quoted
to have made this remark which is understandable and in the fitness of
things. But he was also reported as saying that the army would be
withdrawn after a period of three months. But this is exactly also the
point of concern for the port’s users. A section of businesses were not
present in the advisory committee’s meeting due to their differences of
opinion with the members from the government side who think that an
early return to civilian operation of the port is both possible and
highly desirable. The greater part of business bodies did attend the
committee’s meeting finally but grudgingly and only to convey their
opinion that the army should be withdrawn after ensuring that the port
would continue to run well on a sustainable basis after their
withdrawal.
Businesses remain rightly concerned that the port’s conditions could
once again start deteriorating the moment the army is asked to give up
its healing tasks. From 2007, the then caretaker government shook up the
century-old system of the Chittagong Port Authority (CPA) and
introduced a single-point integrated berth operating by using the army.
This and other reforms revolutionized the working of the port for the
better. The turnaround time of ships came down to 2 to 2.5 days from 6-8
days or longer. The system was working from keeping it after the exit
of the caretaker government. But gradually the system disintegrated
reflected in the steadily worsening conditions and finally the coming to
a standstill all activities of the port when the army took over in the
early part of the current month. This happened for the express reasons
of the CPA, the relevant ministry and the workers’ unions, failing to
act in concert with the lasting good of the port in their focus.
The vested interests who were at work in recent years to undermine the
port’s efficiency for their selfish gains, staged a full comeback almost
unopposed from where it mattered. The recent crisis in the port that
reached a flash point this month did not occur spontaneously. It was in
the making for the last five months when the port’s conditions
progressively deteriorated. The writing was there in the wall for all to
see. But hardly any proactive stance was noted on the part of the
authorities to head the same off.
Thus, the view of all categories of port’s users from the standpoint of
business is that the port must not be allowed to go back to a state of
under-performance again. They oppose the idea that it should be a
priority to send the army back from the port in inordinate haste. They
are all for a longer period of stay by the army as a realistic stop-gap
arrangement and in the interim period the port’s institutions, including
legal and other frameworks, should be built up to ensure that the
vested interests do not find a scope to reassert their power or
influence after the army departs.
Source: Financial Express